On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 02:11:32PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Rajkumar Manoharan
> <rmanohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Debugfs file location:
> > <debugfs_mnt>/ieee80211/phy#/ath9k/base_eeprom
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/debug.c | 147 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/debug.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/debug.c
> > index d1eb896..df71c72 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/debug.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/debug.c
> > @@ -1163,6 +1163,151 @@ static const struct file_operations fops_regdump = {
> > .llseek = default_llseek,/* read accesses f_pos */
> > };
> >
> > +static ssize_t read_file_base_eeprom(struct file *file, char __user *user_buf,
> > + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> > +{
> > + struct ath_softc *sc = file->private_data;
> > + struct ath_hw *ah = sc->sc_ah;
> > + struct ar9300_base_eep_hdr *pBase = NULL;
> > + unsigned int len = 0, size = 1500;
> > + ssize_t retval = 0;
> > + char *buf;
> > +
> > + if (!AR_SREV_9300_20_OR_LATER(ah))
> > + return 0;
>
> This is really really cool stuff, but instead of doing this can we
> instead implement this as a callback design which would enable other
> hw revisions to be supported? If we do not then we need to make the
> code branch out on each type of card.
>
Yeah. Let us have common cb and ath9k & ath9k_htc can make use of it.
Thanks for your comments.
--
Rajkumar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
