On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Rajkumar Manoharan
<rmanohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Debugfs file location:
> <debugfs_mnt>/ieee80211/phy#/ath9k/base_eeprom
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/debug.c | 147 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/debug.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/debug.c
> index d1eb896..df71c72 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/debug.c
> @@ -1163,6 +1163,151 @@ static const struct file_operations fops_regdump = {
> .llseek = default_llseek,/* read accesses f_pos */
> };
>
> +static ssize_t read_file_base_eeprom(struct file *file, char __user *user_buf,
> + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> + struct ath_softc *sc = file->private_data;
> + struct ath_hw *ah = sc->sc_ah;
> + struct ar9300_base_eep_hdr *pBase = NULL;
> + unsigned int len = 0, size = 1500;
> + ssize_t retval = 0;
> + char *buf;
> +
> + if (!AR_SREV_9300_20_OR_LATER(ah))
> + return 0;
This is really really cool stuff, but instead of doing this can we
instead implement this as a callback design which would enable other
hw revisions to be supported? If we do not then we need to make the
code branch out on each type of card.
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
