On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 22:42 +0530, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote: > > Heck, come to think of it, why not do this in wpa_supplicant? > > > I prefer to go with the common layer for both wpa_s and iw. But cfg80211 > seems to be better. In practise, nobody uses iw to maintain connections. Anything that cfg80211 can do, wpa_supplicant can do as well, so I don't really see the point in pushing this into the kernel. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
