On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 19:42 +0200, Matteo Croce wrote:
> + case IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_RATE: {
> + struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband =
> + tx->local->hw.wiphy->bands[tx->channel->band];
> + info->control.rates[0].idx = 0;
> + if (*iterator.this_arg) {
> + int i;
> + for (i = 0; i < sband->n_bitrates; i++)
> + if (sband->bitrates[i].bitrate ==
> + *iterator.this_arg * 5) {
> + info->control.rates[0].idx = i;
> + break;
I don't think you should set the index if the bitrate doesn't exist.
Also, have you actually _tested_ this patch? I see nothing that would
cause rate control to be skipped, so rate control should always override
the data you set up here.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
