On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 23:44 +0300, Arik Nemtsov wrote: > Well in a wl12xx chip we just configure some thresholds to the FW and > it triggers the event for us. Using TX status doesn't really make > sense since the FW has automatic rate control (so 50 tries are more > like 50 * 8). Yeah same for the mac80211 approach, since we take packets, not retries. > > Also, are you sure? Do you really not get _any_ TX status? > > Currently we do get TX status, but there are plans to remove it later on. That's your choice, but I wouldn't do it. You'll have to support TX status when requested, otherwise AP operation won't work, so you need the code anyway. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
