> W dniu 14 kwietnia 2011 14:34 uÅytkownik Hauke Mehrtens > <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx> napisaÅ: > > On 04/14/2011 02:04 PM, RafaÅ MiÅecki wrote: > >> Hauke: you were proposing integrating with drivers/amba. I really > >> expect you to comment on this, please tell us how do you see this now, > >> when we have better overview. I took your proposal seriously, you can > >> see the results above. > > > > I had no closer look at drivers/amba and this bus driver, I just saw > > that there was a discussion about drivers/amba and this implementation > > with no result. When the Bradcom cores are not directly connected to > > AMBA, but are using some sort of wrapper and there are no benefits in > > using drivers/amba, just leave it. > > > > As the implementation of the Braodcom AIX Bus contains some Broadcom > > extensions and there seams to be no normal AMBA device being connected > > to some Broadcom devices with this special interface number 3) "Broadcom > > specific bus (bcmai)" seams to the the best approach in my opinion. > > Thanks for commenting. > > Russell: you were asking: > > What does this do which the 'amba' bus support doesn't? > I believe I explained it well in this thread. Do you still think about > using amba/driver? Do you think we should use it? > > Arnd: I found you saying: > > I believe the one thing we really want from this driver is the bus > > scan code, which is not present in the amba bus implementation, > I explained how it works, I believe scanning (EPROM in this case) it > Broadcom specific, not really AMBA standard. How do you see it? > It might not Broadcom specific as EPROM core seems to be CoreLink one core and maybe is arm-developed. But it isn't documented publicly and we don't know yet if it is obligatory for all amba (or at least axi) interconnects or not. Have nice day, George -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html