W dniu 14 kwietnia 2011 14:34 uÅytkownik Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx> napisaÅ: > On 04/14/2011 02:04 PM, RafaÅ MiÅecki wrote: >> Hauke: you were proposing integrating with drivers/amba. I really >> expect you to comment on this, please tell us how do you see this now, >> when we have better overview. I took your proposal seriously, you can >> see the results above. > > I had no closer look at drivers/amba and this bus driver, I just saw > that there was a discussion about drivers/amba and this implementation > with no result. When the Bradcom cores are not directly connected to > AMBA, but are using some sort of wrapper and there are no benefits in > using drivers/amba, just leave it. > > As the implementation of the Braodcom AIX Bus contains some Broadcom > extensions and there seams to be no normal AMBA device being connected > to some Broadcom devices with this special interface number 3) "Broadcom > specific bus (bcmai)" seams to the the best approach in my opinion. Thanks for commenting. Russell: you were asking: > What does this do which the 'amba' bus support doesn't? I believe I explained it well in this thread. Do you still think about using amba/driver? Do you think we should use it? Arnd: I found you saying: > I believe the one thing we really want from this driver is the bus > scan code, which is not present in the amba bus implementation, I explained how it works, I believe scanning (EPROM in this case) it Broadcom specific, not really AMBA standard. How do you see it? -- RafaÅ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
