On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Johannes Stezenbach <js@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Ivo, > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 05:15:04PM +0100, Ivo Van Doorn wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Helmut Schaa >> <helmut.schaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Thanks for testing Juan. >> > >> > Am Freitag, 18. März 2011 schrieb Juan Carlos Garza: >> >> I applied the patches (manually), and tested the stick. >> >> >> >> The transfer of big loads now is successful. >> > >> > Ivo, Johannes, are there any issues left with the async tx status >> > patches for rt2800usb (in the experimental branch) as they seem to >> > lower the chance for missed tx status reports. >> >> I have to do a performance test to see if there are any issues remaining, >> but so far all those patches resulted in poorer performance (reduced >> association successes). > > IIRC you did no report any newer test results after > http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/pipermail/users_rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/2011-January/003070.html I did get once or twice a warning saying: Queue 14 failed to flush, and I think it did not work afterwards... I do not need to associate, as I use the Access Point rather than a Station. Clients could associate with the access point without problems. But this patch might bring more stability... can someone give me the path to the experimental branch git repository? > (I think this change was merged into one of the other patches in rt2x00/experimental) > > For me association works fast and reliable with these patches, but I > did not have time to test with the wpa_supplicant from > your ros.org code base. > > Without the fix above it is clear why association would be unreliable. > > > Johannes > Regards -- Juan Carlos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
