Hi Ivo, On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 05:15:04PM +0100, Ivo Van Doorn wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Helmut Schaa > <helmut.schaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks for testing Juan. > > > > Am Freitag, 18. März 2011 schrieb Juan Carlos Garza: > >> I applied the patches (manually), and tested the stick. > >> > >> The transfer of big loads now is successful. > > > > Ivo, Johannes, are there any issues left with the async tx status > > patches for rt2800usb (in the experimental branch) as they seem to > > lower the chance for missed tx status reports. > > I have to do a performance test to see if there are any issues remaining, > but so far all those patches resulted in poorer performance (reduced > association successes). IIRC you did no report any newer test results after http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/pipermail/users_rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/2011-January/003070.html (I think this change was merged into one of the other patches in rt2x00/experimental) For me association works fast and reliable with these patches, but I did not have time to test with the wpa_supplicant from your ros.org code base. Without the fix above it is clear why association would be unreliable. Johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
