On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 19:39 +0200, Levi, Shahar wrote:
> On 3/9/11, Luciano Coelho <coelho@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 16:32 +0200, Shahar Levi wrote:
> >> Set different Cox setting between wl127x and wl128x.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Shahar Levi <shahar_levi@xxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/acx.c | 5 +++++
> >> drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/main.c | 6 +++++-
> >> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/acx.c
> >> b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/acx.c
> >> index f0345e6..e970b71 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/acx.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/acx.c
> >> @@ -554,6 +554,11 @@ int wl1271_acx_sg_cfg(struct wl1271 *wl)
> >> goto out;
> >> }
> >>
> >> + if (wl->chip.id == CHIP_ID_1283_PG20)
> >> + c->params[CONF_SG_BT_LOAD_RATIO] = 50;
> >> + else
> >> + c->params[CONF_SG_BT_LOAD_RATIO] = 200;
> >> +
> >
> > You can't change this value in the global array. This needs to be
> > changed only in the allocated ACX. I'll change it before taking it in.
> >
> > Also, I think it's cleaner to keep the correct value for wl127x in the
> > global array (as was before) and only change the value for wl128x here
> > in this function.
> >
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/main.c
> >> b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/main.c
> >> index 32d963d..f8e9e3f 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/main.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/main.c
> >> @@ -54,7 +54,11 @@ static struct conf_drv_settings default_conf = {
> >> [CONF_SG_BT_PER_THRESHOLD] = 7500,
> >> [CONF_SG_HV3_MAX_OVERRIDE] = 0,
> >> [CONF_SG_BT_NFS_SAMPLE_INTERVAL] = 400,
> >> - [CONF_SG_BT_LOAD_RATIO] = 50,
> >> + /*
> >> + * CONF_SG_BT_LOAD_RATIO has wl127x or wl128x dependency
> >> + * (set in wl1271_acx_sg_cfg()
> >> + */
> >> + [CONF_SG_BT_LOAD_RATIO] = 0,
> >> [CONF_SG_AUTO_PS_MODE] = 1,
> >> [CONF_SG_AUTO_SCAN_PROBE_REQ] = 170,
> >> [CONF_SG_ACTIVE_SCAN_DURATION_FACTOR_HV3] = 50,
> >
> > Previously, the value used for wl127x was 50, from the default global
> > settings. Now you're using 200 for wl127x. This looks suspicious. You
> > now use 50 (which was the value for wl127x) for wl128x and 200 for
> > wl127x.
> >
> > At least the change for wl127x should be done in a separate patch.
> It was incorrect value for wl127x. That patch fixes that and set
> wl128x value. I can do the fix for wl127x in separate patch.
Okay, so this means that for wl128x we don't need the current patch at
all. The value is already 50, which is good for wl128x. A new patch
for wl127x should be sent separately.
--
Cheers,
Luca.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
