On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Vivek Natarajan <vivek.natraj@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:50:53AM +0530, Vivek Natarajan wrote: >>>> The default qos value of 55 causes higher power consumption >>>> and the battery drains out quickly. So, remove the pm_qos request >>>> in the driver and the throughout issue in the Intel Pinetrail >>>> platforms in which the DMA latency is seen can be fixed with >>>> the following script: >>>> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mcgrof/scripts/cpudmalatency.c >>>> http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/files/netlatency.c.txt >>>> >>>> More details can be found in the following bugzilla link: >>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27532 >>>> >>>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx >>>> Signed-off-by: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan <mshajakhan@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Natarajan <vnatarajan@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Why did you send me 3 copies of this patch, when I don't need any copies >>> of it? >>> >>> Totally confused, >> >> Vivek, please only ask John to send this to David as stable so it can >> get into 2.6.38-rc, then once there you can refer the sha1sum from >> Linus' tree and justify propagating into the stable series. >> > I had sent separate patches for v2.6.37 and for v2.6.38 since the > patch could not be applied directly to previous versions. So, should I > send this rebased patch for v2.6.37 only after it makes it into > v2.6.38? Affirmative. You cannot propagate stable patches unless they are already in Linus' tree. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
