On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:50:53AM +0530, Vivek Natarajan wrote: >>> The default qos value of 55 causes higher power consumption >>> and the battery drains out quickly. So, remove the pm_qos request >>> in the driver and the throughout issue in the Intel Pinetrail >>> platforms in which the DMA latency is seen can be fixed with >>> the following script: >>> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mcgrof/scripts/cpudmalatency.c >>> http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/files/netlatency.c.txt >>> >>> More details can be found in the following bugzilla link: >>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27532 >>> >>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx >>> Signed-off-by: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan <mshajakhan@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Natarajan <vnatarajan@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Why did you send me 3 copies of this patch, when I don't need any copies >> of it? >> >> Totally confused, > > Vivek, please only ask John to send this to David as stable so it can > get into 2.6.38-rc, then once there you can refer the sha1sum from > Linus' tree and justify propagating into the stable series. > I had sent separate patches for v2.6.37 and for v2.6.38 since the patch could not be applied directly to previous versions. So, should I send this rebased patch for v2.6.37 only after it makes it into v2.6.38? Vivek. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
