On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 06:33:27PM +0530, Sujith wrote:
> Rajkumar Manoharan wrote:
> > > + if (priv->num_ibss_vif ||
> > > + (priv->nvifs && vif->type == NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC)) {
> > > + ath_err(common, "IBSS coexistence with other modes is not allowed\n");
> > > + mutex_unlock(&priv->mutex);
> > > + return -ENOBUFS;
> > > }
> > Need to handle IBSS interface if vifs are already present.
>
> I don't understand, addition of a new IBSS interface is denied if we
> already have an ADHOC interface present, or any other type, for that matter.
> This could be simplified, but this behavior might change in the future ...
>
Yeah. I misunderstood.
--
Rajkumar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
