On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 06:33:27PM +0530, Sujith wrote: > Rajkumar Manoharan wrote: > > > + if (priv->num_ibss_vif || > > > + (priv->nvifs && vif->type == NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC)) { > > > + ath_err(common, "IBSS coexistence with other modes is not allowed\n"); > > > + mutex_unlock(&priv->mutex); > > > + return -ENOBUFS; > > > } > > Need to handle IBSS interface if vifs are already present. > > I don't understand, addition of a new IBSS interface is denied if we > already have an ADHOC interface present, or any other type, for that matter. > This could be simplified, but this behavior might change in the future ... > Yeah. I misunderstood. -- Rajkumar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html