Rajkumar Manoharan wrote:
> > + if (priv->num_ibss_vif ||
> > + (priv->nvifs && vif->type == NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC)) {
> > + ath_err(common, "IBSS coexistence with other modes is not allowed\n");
> > + mutex_unlock(&priv->mutex);
> > + return -ENOBUFS;
> > }
> Need to handle IBSS interface if vifs are already present.
I don't understand, addition of a new IBSS interface is denied if we
already have an ADHOC interface present, or any other type, for that matter.
This could be simplified, but this behavior might change in the future ...
Sujith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
