On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 15:01 +0530, Vivek Natarajan wrote: > >> And this is how I understand this: > >> stop queues, then send nullfunc, then do a flush to get the status and > >> wake queues again irrespective of acked or not(but set the ACK_STATUS > >> correspondingly). If tx() routine of nullfunc fails, then also wake > >> the queues. > > > > Yes, but since the flush is there, the latter (tx fails, ...) won't be > > needed. > > If queues are stopped before sending nullfunc, it is added in the > pending frames queue and the flush after nullfunc is ineffective. So, > is it okay to bypass this queue_stop check with REASON_PS if it is a > nullfunc frame? Any more ideas will be helpful. Ah, but I wasn't thinking of stopping the device queues, just the sdata queues, and the nullfunc doesn't go across those. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
