On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 14:17 -0800, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > I'm pretty sure the devices (but maybe not 3945) implement interrupt > > mitigation at least in some cases. How did you arrive at the conclusion > > that "the driver doesn't actually do any interrupt mitigation"? > > Two reasons: > -- I searched the code and couldn't find any evidence for it > -- If I'm wrong then the quickest way to find out is to make loud > and confident claims in front of people who know better ;-) > I might be wrong. Well, I think you are -- at least for some cases. The driver doesn't need to do anything to implement mitigation, if anything the ucode will do this by itself -- I imagine it'll do this especially for aggregation queues (which I realise aren't relevant in this patch, but still). johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
