On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 05:09:49PM +0000, Chaoxing Lin wrote: > Do we have to choose between hostapd and wpa_supplicant? No, but it should be noted that either one of those is most likely going to be present on the system anyway if any sort of security is used in AP/WDS/mesh/IBSS/STA. > Why not a new daemon, e.g. DFSd or radard? So that it can be used intuitively for all master or IBSS modes. One more interface to define and implement (user space between that new daemon and hostapd/wpa_supplicant).. I'm not strongly against this, but I would expect it to increase the total amount of work needed. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html