Do we have to choose between hostapd and wpa_supplicant? Why not a new daemon, e.g. DFSd or radard? So that it can be used intuitively for all master or IBSS modes. -----Original Message----- From: John W. Linville [mailto:linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 11:31 AM To: Chaoxing Lin Cc: 'Zefir Kurtisi'; linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [RFC] DFS userspace handler On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 04:09:08PM +0000, Chaoxing Lin wrote: > I would vote for a dedidate DFS daemon. > > Straightforward name is better. > Beginners would be hard to understand why WDS/Mesh/IBSS mode requires a hostapd daemon which intuitively means for AP mode.. Perhaps it can be in wpa_supplicant instead? John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
