On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Juuso Oikarinen <juuso.oikarinen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Actually this I don't see any performance impact for better or worse of > this patch on brief testing. I was instructed by some of our other > kernel-dudes that this is actually needed for the cpuidle path too, or > there might be some implications. It might mean your platforms are configured to hit retention (assuming omap) or even off mode in the cpuidle path as well, and in that case it can explain the enable_irq_wake.. > I'm currently trying to find out if this is really needed or not. Sure, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
