On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Juuso Oikarinen <juuso.oikarinen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 14:09 +0200, ext Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:30 PM, <juuso.oikarinen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > From: Juuso Oikarinen <juuso.oikarinen@xxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > Currently the wl12xx interrupts are not configured to wake up the host, which >> > leads to reduced performance. >> >> Can you elaborate what do you mean ? >> >> Today the chip is powered off at system suspend, so it won't trigger >> any interrupts anyway. >> >> When additional suspend modes will be introduced (e.g. WoWL) this will >> be needed of course. > > These are not just for suspend, AFAIK, but apply also to power saving > states. What power states do you mean ? do you mean the cpuidle path ? I don't think it's related. Can you please describe what was the reduced performance that this solved for you ? performance is a hot topic for us now :) Thanks, Ohad. Or do you know better? > > -Juuso > >> Thanks, >> Ohad. > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
