On 2011-02-06 8:01 PM, Ben Greear wrote: > Current code always sets the channel type to NO_HT when scanning. > > From what I can tell, we should be able to send NO_HT packets on > any channel type, and for passive scanning, it should not matter > at all what channel-type we are using. > > I tested relaxing scanning to use the current channel type > when scanning on the operating channel, and it seems to > work. > > Does anyone see any problems with this approach? One thing you should make sure is that once you're done associating to an NO_HT or HT20 AP (and you have no other interfaces to consider), the channel mode must not be HT40 - otherwise it could reduce throughput. - Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
