> > However -- I was thinking of something else, not data packets. While > > scanning, all received beacons will be handed to the scan code. But if > > the mlme code isn't told to stop looking for them, it'll still expect to > > see the beacons. > > Currently, it seems mlme timers are stopped when we start scanning, > and then started when scanning is complete. Ok, I wasn't quite sure about that part -- whether it happened when going off-channel or when starting scan. If it happened while going off-channel this would've been problematic here. > However, I don't see any similar effort in the work_work() method > when it goes off-channel. > > Should we move the timer pause & restart logic into the offchannel_stop_vifs > and offchannel_return methods? Well, sort of no, and sort of yes -- both will disrupt that code in a sense, but even scanning on the same channel will disrupt it due to the beacon diversion, unless we copy the beacons and give them to both sides (scan and mlme)? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html