On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 10:10 -0800, Ben Greear wrote: > > However, I guess it'd also be nice to also address the TODO in work.c > > and move the "don't do so much if not really off-channel" logic into > > that function? You must run into that when trying to associate on one > > vif and the others get stopped etc. unnecessarily to do that. > > I think you are right about this, but due to the tricky nature > of this code, maybe save that for a second patch? Yeah, I think that might be good -- but maybe prepare in your current version by not having the offchannel bit in the scan? In fact -- I'm not even sure why you have two off-channel bits there, but please reply to my comments on v3 rather than here. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
