On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 10:21 -0500, Chuck Crisler wrote: > What is the reason that the design calls for a scan in response to a session > timeout? A session timeout doesn't happen because of a roam, so the original > AP is probably still good. Why scan? I don't think there's any design here, and in any case that's wpa_supplicant's doing. :) johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
