On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 13:16:13 Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 12:59 +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > > > I'm not sure about this -- shouldn't that be global information? > > > If one device in the system records a radar on the channel, it > > > surely applies to other devices as well, even if they are > > > hot-plugged after the radar was found? > > > > True, I've based this on our IRC discussions, the consensus there > > was to do it per-wiphy only at first. > > I thought what we had discussed there (but I missed at least one > meeting) was that the *detector* state, for software-based detection, > should be per wiphy. I never heard anywhere that the result of that > should be local too. Hmm, ok, I might have got that wrong. We should discuss this today on IRC and whatever the consensus is, I will adjust the code. -- Best regards, Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Bernhard Schmidt (software development) saxnet GmbH, Willy-Brandt-Ring 1, 08606 Oelsnitz Tel. +49 (0) 3741 300 6. 100 - Fax +49 (0) 3741 300 6. 101 managing director: Steffen Dreise - county court Chemnitz - HRB 23017 http://www.saxnet.de -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
