On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 11:43:22 Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 10:16 +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > > @@ -1241,6 +1244,8 @@ static int ieee80211_set_channel(struct wiphy > > *wiphy, > > > > if (sdata && sdata->vif.type != NL80211_IFTYPE_MONITOR) > > > > ieee80211_bss_info_change_notify(sdata, BSS_CHANGED_HT); > > > > + ieee80211_radar_detection_enable(local, chan); > > + > > So you're ignoring the return value -- that doesn't seem right at > all. Also, if the driver doesn't implement detection, you should > probably reject using the channel. Yeah right, I've missed that. I wasn't sure about how to proper handle opmode and then forgot about it.. Point is, this should only fail on an opmode which does involve sending beacons (or in other words, opmodes which act as a master device) but not for sta. Will think about something. -- Best regards, Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Bernhard Schmidt (software development) saxnet GmbH, Willy-Brandt-Ring 1, 08606 Oelsnitz Tel. +49 (0) 3741 300 6. 100 - Fax +49 (0) 3741 300 6. 101 managing director: Steffen Dreise - county court Chemnitz - HRB 23017 http://www.saxnet.de -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
