On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 14:03 +0100, Coelho, Luciano wrote: > On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 13:54 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 14:51 +0200, coelho@xxxxxx wrote: > > > From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@xxxxxx> > > > > > > When the buffer size is set to zero in the block ack parameter set > > > field, we should use the maximum supported number of subframes. The > > > existing code was bogus and was doing some unnecessary calculations > > > that lead to wrong values. > > > > > > Thanks Johannes for helping me figure this one out. > > > > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx > > > Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > It'd be easier for stable if you reordered with the other patch, I > > think, but I guess it's easy enough to fix up. > > Will do. Sent v2 rebased in a cleaner head and changed "a-msdu" to AMPDU in the commit subject, as Johannes pointed out. -- Cheers, Luca. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
