On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 13:54 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 14:51 +0200, coelho@xxxxxx wrote: > > From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@xxxxxx> > > > > When the buffer size is set to zero in the block ack parameter set > > field, we should use the maximum supported number of subframes. The > > existing code was bogus and was doing some unnecessary calculations > > that lead to wrong values. > > > > Thanks Johannes for helping me figure this one out. > > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > It'd be easier for stable if you reordered with the other patch, I > think, but I guess it's easy enough to fix up. Will do. > Also some older stable versions might have this code in a different > file, but I'm not sure how to handle that. Dunno how to handle that either... If I need to do something, someone please just let me know. ;) -- Cheers, Luca. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
