On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Bob Copeland <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:34:19AM +1000, Jonathan Guerin wrote: >> > For what it's worth, I tested pid and minstrel a while ago with a >> > modified mac80211_hwsim, and found minstrel to be quite a bit better >> > at rate adaptation. So while it may be worth testing out for this >> > particular use case, minstrel is probably the way to go in general. >> >> So, while I say this with no idea how to do it, might it be worth >> fixing Minstrel so that it adheres to mac80211's maximum retry values? > > Yeah, so that's what the linked patch I posted tries to do :) Doh! I didn't read it properly - I assumed it was for PID... My bad. Cheers, Jonathan > > -- > Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
