On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Mark Mentovai <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> This series addresses the bug pointed out by Mark Mentovai <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> when there is a delay on CRDA and you use multiple cards with the same regulatory >> domain. After some testing I realized this also introduced an issue when using >> multiple cards with different regulatory settings. The issue is present only >> when there is a delay in CRDA so technically this is not a regression so I am >> not marking these as stable fixes. It also does not seem to be a regulatory bug >> as when the issue is present you'd end up with an intersected regulatory domain >> (same alpha2s) or get the regulatory domain rejected for the second card if >> the alpha2 was different. >> >> Thanks to Mark for his testing, good ideas on alternative ways to resolve this >> and thorough reports. > > Excellent! Iâve read through this patch set and approve. Iâve tested > it out. It definitely does the trick. > > The one thing I spotted was that you didnât revise the @processed > comment in regulatory.h from patch 4. I did but did not see any difference in your comments. > I donât know which of Signed-off-by, Acked-by, or Tested-by is > appropriate here, but as far as Iâm concerned, this is a winner. Tesed-by: foo would be good. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
