Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > This series addresses the bug pointed out by Mark Mentovai <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > when there is a delay on CRDA and you use multiple cards with the same regulatory > domain. After some testing I realized this also introduced an issue when using > multiple cards with different regulatory settings. The issue is present only > when there is a delay in CRDA so technically this is not a regression so I am > not marking these as stable fixes. It also does not seem to be a regulatory bug > as when the issue is present you'd end up with an intersected regulatory domain > (same alpha2s) or get the regulatory domain rejected for the second card if > the alpha2 was different. > > Thanks to Mark for his testing, good ideas on alternative ways to resolve this > and thorough reports. Excellent! I’ve read through this patch set and approve. I’ve tested it out. It definitely does the trick. The one thing I spotted was that you didn’t revise the @processed comment in regulatory.h from patch 4. I don’t know which of Signed-off-by, Acked-by, or Tested-by is appropriate here, but as far as I’m concerned, this is a winner. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
