> This hacks leads to incorrect SPROM parsing for me and reading for
> example MAC as: 00:00:00:54:00:00. Michael G. who introduced this
> confirmed it is not needed anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: RafaÅ MiÅecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Michael: I guess I could add your Tested-by. Is that right?
That ist right. I suppose the correct entry would be
Tested-by: Michael Gerdau <mgd@xxxxxxx>
> John: it's 2.6.38 ofc. It should apply cleanly no matter if you applied
> my previous patch for guessing unknown SPROM revision. There is not
> dependence between that 2 patches.
> ---
> drivers/ssb/pci.c | 4 ----
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ssb/pci.c b/drivers/ssb/pci.c
> index b5343ac..f529663 100644
> --- a/drivers/ssb/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/ssb/pci.c
> @@ -580,10 +580,6 @@ static int sprom_extract(struct ssb_bus *bus, struct
> ssb_sprom *out, * Always extract r1. */
> out->revision = 1;
> ssb_dprintk(KERN_DEBUG PFX "SPROM treated as revision %d\n",
> out->revision); - } else if (bus->chip_id == 0x4321) {
> - /* the BCM4328 has a chipid == 0x4321 and a rev 4 SPROM */
> - out->revision = 4;
> - ssb_dprintk(KERN_DEBUG PFX "SPROM treated as revision %d\n",
> out->revision); }
>
> switch (out->revision) {
--
Michael Gerdau email: mgd@xxxxxxx
GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
