On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:51:37PM +0530, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote: > >On Thursday 11 November 2010 14:23:41 Rajkumar Manoharan wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 06:43:57PM +0530, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote: > > >> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 06:05:14PM +0530, Christian Lamparter wrote: > > > >> On Wednesday 10 November 2010 12:37:21 Rajkumar Manoharan wrote: > > > > >> Treat PIDs (0xA704, 0x1200) as AR7010 devices. > > > >> > > > > >just a though, but instead of relying only on the pid and > >> > > hope for no collisions. you could put a @driver_info flag > >> > > for all AR7010 devices into the usb_device_id table and > > >> > remove the per-device "cases". > > > >> > >> > Make sense. Thanks for your review. I'll resend the patch. > >> > > >> After adding @driver_info to replace per-device cases, > >> the patch looks like cleanup one which is not compatible for stable kernel. > >> So let the previous patches to be integrated, due to minimal changes. > >> And I'll submit the cleanup patch separately. Is that fine? > >sure? > > > > Or is this a question directed to John? > > Both you and John. Since these patches are stable and enable support to new devices, > I prefer to go with minimal changes. I will submit the cleanup patches to wireless-testing. > > Any comments John? Sounds fine. -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
