>On Thursday 11 November 2010 14:23:41 Rajkumar Manoharan wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 06:43:57PM +0530, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 06:05:14PM +0530, Christian Lamparter wrote: > > >> On Wednesday 10 November 2010 12:37:21 Rajkumar Manoharan wrote: > > > >> Treat PIDs (0xA704, 0x1200) as AR7010 devices. > > >> > > > >just a though, but instead of relying only on the pid and >> > > hope for no collisions. you could put a @driver_info flag >> > > for all AR7010 devices into the usb_device_id table and > >> > remove the per-device "cases". > > >> >> > Make sense. Thanks for your review. I'll resend the patch. >> > >> After adding @driver_info to replace per-device cases, >> the patch looks like cleanup one which is not compatible for stable kernel. >> So let the previous patches to be integrated, due to minimal changes. >> And I'll submit the cleanup patch separately. Is that fine? >sure? > > Or is this a question directed to John? Both you and John. Since these patches are stable and enable support to new devices, I prefer to go with minimal changes. I will submit the cleanup patches to wireless-testing. Any comments John? -- Rajkumar-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
