On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 11:07 +0100, ext Kalle Valo wrote: > Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> What about wl1251 vs. wl12agn (or wl12bgn if no .11a support), like iwlwifi? > > > > Hmmm... wl1251 supports bg. wl12xx supports abgn. I don't really see > > the logic in this? What difference does it make comparing to calling it > > wl12xx? From wl12agn the user still doesn't know whether wl1251 is > > supported or not. > > Just to confuse even more: TI wl1253 (the chip) supports 11a and it > would be easy to add wl1253 (the chip) support to wl1251 (the driver). > I just haven't seen any linux devices using wl1253 yet. Oh, I didn't even know that wl1253 even existed. :) But yeah, it complicates things even more indeed. -- Cheers, Luca. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
