Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> What about wl1251 vs. wl12agn (or wl12bgn if no .11a support), like iwlwifi? > > Hmmm... wl1251 supports bg. wl12xx supports abgn. I don't really see > the logic in this? What difference does it make comparing to calling it > wl12xx? From wl12agn the user still doesn't know whether wl1251 is > supported or not. Just to confuse even more: TI wl1253 (the chip) supports 11a and it would be easy to add wl1253 (the chip) support to wl1251 (the driver). I just haven't seen any linux devices using wl1253 yet. I agree with Luca, name wl12agn would not help. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
