On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 16:50 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Jouni Malinen <j@xxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 02:07:22PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> Jouni, just to be clear so you are fine with dropping explicitly the > >> tear down of the BA agreement to the old AP? > > > > If you are talking about not transmitting a frame, then yes, but > > obviously, we would still need to locally tear down whatever we have set > > up.. > > Sure. Right -- exactly what my (untested!!) patch did. > > I think it would be a good default policy to not send any frames to the > > old AP after we have decided to roam to a new one. If this does not work > > well in some networks, I would like to here more detailed description on > > what exactly is happening. > > No that's fine, I just was curious how the bridge stuff you described > was handled in enterprise networks, you would know better :) Look at net/mac80211/cfg.c - ieee80211_send_layer2_update. > OK -- so lets go with Johanne's patch instead of patch 2 and 3 as he > suggested :) Have you tested it? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
