On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 06:27:25AM -0700, Johannes Berg wrote: > How about this instead of your patches 2 and 3? > > We're disassociating from the old AP since we associate with the new AP, > so there's not a whole lot of sense in explicitly tearing down > aggregation sessions either, right? Good question, but why do we not get a warning when transmitting the disassoc frame? The race is hit when we are on the wrong channel, are you sure we are not sending a disassoc on a wrong channel? I would expect a smoother transition if we actually disassoc fromt the old AP in the ESS and I am not sure if we do that right now. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
