On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 10:22 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> It seems he put two VAPs into a bridge device, and got an
> assert here (nevermind the printk, I just added that to
> help debug the issue).
>
> static void __ieee80211_wake_queue(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, int queue,
> enum queue_stop_reason reason)
> {
> struct ieee80211_local *local = hw_to_local(hw);
> struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata;
>
> trace_wake_queue(local, queue, reason);
>
> if (WARN_ON(queue >= hw->queues)) {
> printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: queue: %i hw->queues: %i\n",
> sdata->name, queue, hw->queues);
> return;
> }
>
>
> Before I try to reproduce this, it is valid to add APs to bridge
> devices in the first place?
Yes, it's valid, we catch the invalid cases in cfg80211.
Hitting the assert there is rather strange though.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
