I got a bug report from someone using my ath5k VAP patch.
It seems he put two VAPs into a bridge device, and got an
assert here (nevermind the printk, I just added that to
help debug the issue).
static void __ieee80211_wake_queue(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, int queue,
enum queue_stop_reason reason)
{
struct ieee80211_local *local = hw_to_local(hw);
struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata;
trace_wake_queue(local, queue, reason);
if (WARN_ON(queue >= hw->queues)) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: queue: %i hw->queues: %i\n",
sdata->name, queue, hw->queues);
return;
}
Before I try to reproduce this, it is valid to add APs to bridge
devices in the first place?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
