On 10/04/2010 10:21 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 10:09:06AM -0700, Peter Stuge wrote:
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
This on wireless-testing from Friday, plus a few debugfs patches
I posted recently.
I was running two STA just fine, and then tried to add 128 more.
You're serious right? I mean I'm happy your serious, but whoa, you
want 130 STAs on one interface working fine?
Come on. If it is impossible to work because of whatever limitations
then wouldn't it make sense for the driver to throw an error instead
of not throwing an error and just not working?
You're right but if you are using the ath9k virtual wiphy stuff please
not that code is intended to be removed, it was experimental code and
this is also why we don't have good documentation for it. It was just
a hack as a proof of concept. The real solution needs to take place on
cfg80211/mac80211.
I'm not using virtual wiphy..just one PHY and lots of STA devices
on top of it.
I'd be more than happy to see the wiphy stuff dissappear, as it
seems useless to me. Using lots of STA and AP devices on a single
phy is much more useful, however.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
