On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 12:09 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Johannes Berg > <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 12:03 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > >> > We put them into the reorder buffer, but if we get a reorder timeout > >> > while scanning we'll drop the frames which isn't necessary. > >> > >> Ah, got it, thanks, good catch. Guess its not a terrible stable fix, > >> but at least important for those who care about VoIP and such. > > > > You wouldn't typically use aggregation on VO traffic, I think? > > ath9k uses aggregation for all data traffic. But it can only control TX :) Which is, of course, relevant if it's used as an AP, but for typical VO traffic I would argue that using aggregation is a bug since it'll just increase delays & jitter. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
