On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 11:14 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Johannes Berg >> <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > Even if the reorder timeout timer fires while >> > scanning, the frames weren't received during >> > scanning and therefore shouldn't be dropped. >> >> I don't get what we are doing with these frames today, are you saying >> we pegged some of these frames into the reorder buffer when starting a >> sw scan, or that we were dropping them? > > You keep confusing TX and RX ... ;) > > This is all about RX only. yeah, I was thinking about the release reorder buffer and its respective timeout, I thought that's what the subject of this patch was about. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
