On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 11:58 +0200, Oikarinen Juuso (Nokia-MS/Tampere) wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 11:49 +0200, ext Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 12:46 +0300, Juuso Oikarinen wrote: > > > > > > > +#define WL1271_CIPHER_SUITE_GEM 0x000FACFF > > > > > > > > NACK, this is a standards-reserved value. Use the correct ID for it or > > > > allocate one within your own OUI if you don't want to admit what this > > > > really is (and by now all readers here will know anyway.) > > > > > > Well I'm sure many or most know what this patch is about. The choice of > > > value was not intended to hide that. > > > > > > You're right though, we'll need to change the OUI of the value, unless > > > you can point me to an official value to use. > > > > Well, ISO/IEC JTC 1 N 9880 says you should use 00-14-72:1. > > Heh, yes, my local expert on this just gave me the same value. Thanks. > > One new patch coming up! Cool, thanks for fixing this quickly, Juuso. I'll replace the current patch with your new one. -- Cheers, Luca. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
