On 09/16/2010 08:02 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Bruno Randolf<br1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
John, Luis,
I'm a little confused about which tree to use. I though we should base driver
development on wireless-testing, but I see that you merge patches into
wireless-next first. So should we re-base patches to wireless-next before we
send them?
Rule of thumb is if its large use linux-next, wireless-testing just
lets you actually boot a usable kernel.
I saw what looked like a nice series of patches from you four days ago
(power save, etc). But, they have not been applied to wireless-testing.
Is there a tree that does contain these sorts of patches, or must
we manually apply them to our own trees if we want to try them out?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
