Search Linux Wireless

wireless-testing or wireless-next

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John, Luis,

I'm a little confused about which tree to use. I though we should base driver 
development on wireless-testing, but I see that you merge patches into 
wireless-next first. So should we re-base patches to wireless-next before we 
send them?

Also, AFAIK, compat-wireless is based on linux-next, so if I want to create a 
compat-wireless package based on my latest driver changes (I need to do this 
frequently for testing my driver on my platform), I always run into problems 
because my latest driver is in wireless-testing and not in linux-next. Do you 
have any advise on a proper workflow here?

Thanks,
bruno
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux