On Wed September 15 2010 16:27:01 Jonathan Guerin wrote: > So, we would prefer to match the spec for an out-of-the-box build, > even tho it would appear to be a worse-performing driving to users? sure, we need to comply to the specs. bruno > -- > Jonathan Guerin > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Jonathan Guerin <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> the thing is, like bob said, that we don't really know much about what > >>> the HW expects in some of these registers, so unless you can prove > >>> your changes to be correct - e.g. by measurements which fit the > >>> theoretical model better, or by better thruput, it's hard to say if > >>> they are correct or not. > >>> > >>> so before you worry about how to make a correct patch, just go ahead > >>> and change those initvals to what you believe they should be. if it > >>> improves something, let's talk about how to correctly fix it. > >> > >> I don't mean to be a smart-ass, but wouldn't setting the correct > >> values here decrease the throughput? I'm not quite sure how to verify > >> an improvement, other than get the card to contend for the medium with > >> another known-working card? Does this sound reasonable? > > > > Yes, it does sound reasonable. You might get throughput increase by > > violating the spec. > > > > -- > > Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
