Jonathan Guerin <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> the thing is, like bob said, that we don't really know much about what the HW >> expects in some of these registers, so unless you can prove your changes to be >> correct - e.g. by measurements which fit the theoretical model better, or by >> better thruput, it's hard to say if they are correct or not. >> >> so before you worry about how to make a correct patch, just go ahead and >> change those initvals to what you believe they should be. if it improves >> something, let's talk about how to correctly fix it. > > I don't mean to be a smart-ass, but wouldn't setting the correct > values here decrease the throughput? I'm not quite sure how to verify > an improvement, other than get the card to contend for the medium with > another known-working card? Does this sound reasonable? Yes, it does sound reasonable. You might get throughput increase by violating the spec. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
