On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 07:47 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > I'll see if I can get ath9k to use the normal iterator. I didn't need my > own iterator, because I could just pass in NULL for iterator and pass > active_only as false. active_only as false still doesn't seem right. Why would you care about it before an interface is up? > I think you should consider returning the count for the number of times the > iterator was called because it's simple code, and it would save the same logic > in each driver's iterator methods (or at least, ath9k). Yeah, that seems like a good change, but I think we should probably get to the bottom of it first (the sdata->bss change on the other hand seems fine as is) johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
