On 2010-07-26 10:37 PM, Björn Smedman wrote: > 2010/7/26 Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >> On 2010-07-26 9:23 PM, Björn Smedman wrote: >>> 2010/7/26 Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> * When tx is aggregated most rate control probe frames end up inside >>> aggregates and are never used for probing (effective probe frequency >>> is divided by average aggregate length). >> Nope, a probing frame never ends up inside an aggregate. It's always >> sent out as a single frame, which is why I had to make the decision >> about sending a probing frame more complex in minstrel_ht, compared to >> minstrel - the previous 10% stuff was limiting aggregation size. > > Ok, I must have jumped to conclusions. I looked quickly at the code > and had the impression that it only cared about the RATE_PROBE flag if > it was on the first subframe of the aggregate, and then I compared > debug output from rc and xmit like this: Oh, wait. It seems that you may be right after all. I think I was remembering stuff from the wrong codebase again Well, at least what I described is what I think the code should be doing ;) - Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
